Follow-up Master's Studies: Learning to Think Beyond the Right Answer

The notion that higher education is merely a pathway to obtaining a degree is fortunately becoming outdated. In the NEWTON world, a degree marks the formal completion of studies, but what happens before you earn it is far more important.

University education fundamentally transforms the way people think about the world, make decisions, and solve problems. Follow-up master's studies are not simply a continuation of a bachelor's programme, nor are they merely an expansion of professional knowledge. Their essence lies in a deeper transformation of how students think about themselves, their field of study, knowledge itself, and the world around them.

While bachelor's studies are often focused on mastering fundamental concepts, methods, theories, and professional language, master's education creates a space where students learn to work with this knowledge more independently, critically, and responsibly.

Knowledge Alone Is Not Enough

The traditional view of higher education often follows a simple logic: the more information a person acquires, the better prepared they are for professional life. Today's world, however, demonstrates that knowledge alone is no longer sufficient. 

Bachelor's programmes equip students with the essential tools of their discipline. You learn how to calculate cash flow, build a marketing funnel, or work with generative AI tools.

Research on university students' thinking conducted by our lecturer and psychologist, Barbora Pánková, suggests that in the earlier stages of higher education, students often retain a rather black-and-white view of the world. This is particularly characteristic of the bachelor's level, where students frequently seek 'the one correct answer,' a clear set of instructions, or a definitive solution. At this stage, they naturally tend to expect guidance from an authority figure, whether a lecturer, manager, professional publication, or established methodology.

Today's business environment is highly dynamic. Companies and organisations operate in conditions of significant uncertainty. Managers, entrepreneurs, and specialists increasingly encounter challenges that have no single correct solution. Top leaders do not solve textbook problems with clearly defined parameters; instead, they face ill-structured problems where data is incomplete, variables change constantly, and no predetermined algorithm exists.

The ability to navigate complexity, consider multiple perspectives, and make decisions in situations where no clear instructions are available has become one of the most valuable competencies of our time.

To succeed in this environment, our thinking must evolve towards postformal and relativistic reasoning. According to the theory of relativistic postformal thought developed by American scholar Jan D. Sinnott—whose methodology Barbora Pánková adapted to the Czech higher education context—a mature strategic mind is characterised by the ability to tolerate paradox, recognise hidden complexity, and make informed subjective judgments about 'truth' in situations where no absolute truth exists.

In this sense, follow-up master's studies represent a qualitative shift from bachelor's education. Students are no longer expected simply to learn the 'right answers.' Instead, they are encouraged to recognise that in professional and academic reality, there is often no single correct solution. They learn to compare different approaches, assess their strengths and limitations, formulate their own perspectives, and take responsibility for them. 

Knowledge thus evolves into judgment.

From One Correct Answer to a World of Possibilities

One of the most fascinating findings of developmental psychology is that adulthood does not automatically imply a higher level of thinking. American psychologist William Perry observed that many young people enter higher education with a dualistic worldview. They seek correct answers, rely on clear authorities, and assume that most problems have a single solution. Over time, however, they discover that reality is far more complex.

Bachelor's education is often viewed as a preparatory stage. As Professor Janíček noted in his analysis of the Czech academic environment published in Technický týdeník, the relatively short duration of bachelor's programmes frequently does not provide enough time to fully develop deep expertise and a comprehensive understanding of complex systems and interrelationships.

Follow-up master's studies institutionalise the transition into a full professional role. During this stage, students undergo two key transformative processes that Barbora Pánková identifies as fundamental pillars of higher education development:

Decentration of Thinking (Reduction of Egocentrism)

Students learn to detach themselves from criticism. Constructive feedback on a business project is no longer perceived as an attack on personal integrity. They gain perspective, become capable of engaging in meaningful debate, and learn to revise their views when presented with valid arguments.

Goal Centration

Thinking becomes more internally driven. Students develop a stronger internal locus of control—a deep awareness of their own agency. Rather than waiting to be told what the system expects of them, they begin defining their own goals and strategies and take full responsibility for their business decisions.

In her work, Barbora Pánková builds on Jan D. Sinnott's theory of postformal thinking, according to which more advanced reasoning is characterised by the ability to accept multiple perspectives, work with contradictions, and recognise that different situations may require different solutions (Pánková, 2021; Sinnott, 1998).

This is not about abandoning truth or expertise. Quite the opposite. It is about recognising that complex problems require complex approaches. This shift is often one of the most significant differences between bachelor's and master's education.

The Architecture of Master's Studies at NEWTON

At NEWTON University, our master's programmes are intentionally designed to move beyond academic formalism. The entire curriculum is structured to stimulate postformal thinking through specialised, practice-oriented modules that mirror the complexity of real-world professional environments.

A Master's Thesis as a Strategic Business Project

A bachelor's thesis demonstrates your ability to work with academic sources and solve a specific, clearly defined practical problem. A master's thesis goes much further. It requires a deeper and more independent engagement with a professional issue, where students are no longer merely applying existing knowledge but critically connecting, interpreting, and using it to formulate their own expert perspective.

The purpose of master's education is to develop true professionals. At NEWTON, we do not ask students to produce theoretical papers destined to gather dust on a shelf.

Instead, we encourage them to identify a real and complex challenge within their current workplace or entrepreneurial environment. The master's thesis becomes a practical tool for solving a critical business bottleneck through professional research and multi-causal analysis. The outcome is a fully developed strategy, methodology, or proposal that can be implemented immediately in practice.

The transformation in thinking that characterises master's education does not occur solely through the writing of a thesis. NEWTON fosters deeper and more independent reasoning by consistently placing students in authentic professional and managerial situations.

This transformation is supported through case studies, project-based learning, discussions, teamwork, collaboration with industry experts, and continuous feedback. By engaging with diverse opinions and perspectives, students learn that most challenges do not have a single correct solution but rather multiple viable alternatives.

As a result, they develop critical thinking, intellectual humility, the ability to understand broader contexts, and the confidence to make responsible decisions even in uncertain situations.

AI and Process Automation

At the bachelor's level, AI education focuses primarily on execution: how to write effective prompts for ChatGPT or generate images using AI tools.

At the master's level, students become architects of organisational ecosystems.

They bring their own case studies or analyse real operational challenges within companies, designing implementations of large language models (LLMs), autonomous AI agents, process digitalisation, and automation initiatives that balance technological possibilities with economic efficiency. This means learning how to connect innovation with measurable business value.

This is precisely what today's global transformation demands. The market no longer needs professionals who merely use AI tools. It increasingly requires leaders who can integrate AI systematically into business strategy and organisational development.

Communication Skills Led by Industry Experts

The Communication and Presentation Skills module, led by Zdeněk Mikulka and Marian Jelínek Jr., is not about rehearsing polished gestures or presentation tricks. Instead, students develop cognitive flexibility in human interaction.

They learn how to negotiate in crisis situations, defend unpopular strategic decisions before stakeholders and shareholders, and communicate complex information in a clear and understandable way. These skills are essential for leaders who must navigate ambiguity while maintaining credibility and trust.

Master's Studies Are Not for Everyone

Pursuing a follow-up master's degree is not the right choice for everyone. It requires time, energy, commitment, and a willingness to step outside one's comfort zone. However, if bachelor's education is about building professional foundations, master's studies are often the stage at which individuals learn to think like genuine professionals.

The goal is not simply to acquire more knowledge. It is to develop the ability to navigate uncertainty, manage complexity, critically evaluate information, and create original solutions. And today, these are precisely the capabilities that determine who merely reacts to change—and who actively shapes it.

Explore Our Master's Programmes

References: 

• HAZARI, A. et al., 2019. Factors Influencing Identity Formation in Engineering Postgraduate Students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(4), 245–254.
• HAŇKA, R. a M. JANÍČEK, 2010. Připravenost bakalářů pro technickou praxi. Technický týdeník. roč. 58, č. 14, s. 12-13. ISSN 0040-1064.
• HAZARI, A. et al., 2019. Factors influencing identity formation in engineering postgraduate students. IEEE Transactions on Education. roč. 62, č. 4, s. 245-254. ISSN 0018-9359.
• HUGHES, B. et al., 2018. Engineering identity formation among university students: The role of research and internships. In: Proceedings of the Fronties in Education Conference (FIE). San Jose, CA, USA, 3–6 October 2018. New York: IEEE, s. 1-8. ISBN 978-1-5386-1234-5.
• KEGAN, Robert, 1994. In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674445888.
• KUHN, Deanna, Richard CHENEY a Michael WEINSTOCK, 2000. The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development. roč. 15, č. 3, s. 309-328. ISSN 0885-2014.
• LIQUETE, E. et al., 2025. Engineering identity in the European Higher Education Area: Diversity and pedagogical implications. European Journal of Engineering Education. roč. 50, č. 2, s. 112-128. ISSN 0304-3797.
• PÁNKOVÁ, Barbora, 2021. Kognitivní vývoj v období vysokoškolského studia. Praha. Disertační práce. Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta, Katedra psychologie. Vedoucí práce Miloš Kučera.
• SINNOTT, Jan D., 1998. The Development of Logic in Adulthood: Postformal Thought and Its Applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 0-306-45723-7.
• WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, 2025. The Future of Jobs Report 2025. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Dostupné z: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
• ČESKO, 1998. Zákon č. 111/1998 Sb., o vysokých školách a o změně a doplnění dalších zákonů (zákon o vysokých školách). In: Sbírka zákonů České republiky. roč. 1998, částka 39. Dostupné také z: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/1998-111